Jakarta, hitclubapk3 Indonesia
–
Ahmad Dhani
almost expelled from a meeting at the DPR while discussing
Royalty music
.It all began when the DPR Commission X member attended a coordination meeting at Commission XIII on Wednesday (8/27).
The coordination meeting was also attended by the Indonesian Composer Association (Action), including Ariel Noah as Deputy Chairperson of the Indonesian Vibration (VISION).
Ariel at the meeting, as reported
detikcom
On Wednesday (27/8), highlighted the complexity of the license to use songs, especially when the singer brought the work of others at commercial events.
“In the case that was said to be commercial, in the form of pensi is already commercial, right? Is that also applies the same?”Ariel asked.
“It was also mentioned that not all of them, even a cafe singer who was commercially, it did not need permission. Well, that’s what makes us confused actually,” Ariel said in a meeting at the Parliament Complex, Senayan, Jakarta.
According to Ariel, there needs to be a clear classification for the mandatory permit singer model.He gave an example of a singer whose fee was large, or all without exception because the clause was still gray in the Copyright Law.
[Gambas: hitclubapk3 video]
The discussion heats up when Ahmad Dhani immediately interrupted because he wanted to answer Ariel’s statement.However, Chairman of Commission XIII Willy Aditya stressed that the coordination meeting was only to accommodate problems, not debates.
“This is not a forum to reciprocate rhymes,” Willy said.
Ahmad Dhani had determined to respond, to state that he would contact Ariel Noal via WhatsApp.
A similar situation occurs when Judika opens her voice and emphasizes the importance of respecting the rights of the songwriter.He gave an example that he always included a clause about royalties in the contract every time she was on..
He considered the main problem of music royalties not only in permission rules, but also in the distribution system that was still messy.
“If Mas Piyu said he had to be permitted first, yes, okay. But the fact is in the field, there are things that make the ecosystem not tasty,” said Judika.
Dhani then cut Judika’s words by questioning the purpose of the statement.The situation then made Willy reprimand Dhani by stating that the leader of Dewa 19 could be expelled from the forum.
“Once again interruptions, we have the right to remove
Jenengan
From the forum, “Willy stressed.
Although the atmosphere is rather hot, Judika continues his talk by saying the initial purpose of a musician is that his work can be sung by many people.
However, new problems can arise if the economic and moral rights of the creator are violated.
“If the economic rights are not paid, moral rights are disturbed, or rushed songs, we can complain,” he said.
Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright regulates royalty payments for songwriters in Indonesia by using a collective system channeled by the Collective Management Institute (LMK) and the National Collective Management Institute (LMKN).
However, the collective system or what is referred to as Blanket License was apparently judged by some creators unsatisfactory because it claimed to get an unfit nominal when the song was delivered by other singers on the stage.
A number of musicians then try to use different systems in royalty payments, such as direct royalty payments or direct license.
Not only that, many of them eventually assess the royalty distribution system in Indonesia is not optimal and triggers doubts from songwriters.
The situation made the musicians decide to release their work by the public or restaurant/cafe managers along with the longer Royalty chaos in Indonesia.
Some of these musicians, such as Dewa 19, Charly Van Houten, Rhoma Irama, Thomas Ramdhan Gigi, Juicy Luicy, Ari Lasso to Tompi.
(Chri)
Read More: 5 US Troops Were Reportedly Shot At The Georgian Military Base
Read More: Chinese and US military officials met Prabowo this week, what’s wrong?
